Digital Fortress

Someone at work heard of my interest in Cryptonomicon, and recommended that I check out Digital Fortress, a Dan Brown (I know…) novel (fiction of course) about the NSA, and an “unbreakable” code. It’s an interesting book so far, but it’s a bit frustrating to experience technical details that are incorrect or grossly misleading. I hate when writers do that. There’s so little good crypto fiction out there that what’s out there should be vetted by someone in the business prior to publication. Bits vs bytes, bad buzzwords, and even worse, terrible character names. I mean, come on, “Trevor Strathmore?”

1 Response to “Digital Fortress”


  1. 1 bobgerman

    I’m inclined to suspend further criticism due to the publishing date. For something written in 1998, I will give it some slack. But when I came upon a section whereby a software developer would allegedly “not notice” that his code had been tampered with and that the released version was different than what he had written, I had a major objection — I mean come on, they never heard of md5sum, described in RFC 1321 in 1992?

Leave a Reply